Attention Visitor:
To fully participate in Inspired Opulence, you must register: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Inspired Opulence » Community Forums » The Archives » Does philosophy still have a place next to science?


The Archives Old, buried threads are in here.

Does philosophy still have a place next to science? -

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2007, 04:34 AM   #1 (permalink)
koen
 
koen's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a koen RSS Feed

Does philosophy still have a place next to science?

Does philosophy still have a place next to science?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
Old 06-27-2007, 04:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
robotron77
 
robotron77's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a robotron77 RSS Feed

Only when philosophy does not contradict science.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
Old 06-27-2007, 04:39 AM   #3 (permalink)
that guy ▲
 
Lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In this thread
Posts: 1,124 Lightning RSS Feed

Lightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scaleLightning is too good for this scale
Send a message via AIM to Lightning Send a message via MSN to Lightning
Only if you equate "philosophy" to "religion."
Lightning is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
Old 06-27-2007, 04:41 AM   #4 (permalink)
brad
 
brad's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a brad RSS Feed

Philosophy is more fundamental. For example, notice that some "philosophies" reject the theory of evolution altogether.

The fundamental issues of philosophy -- is there a world that follows natural laws, and can we know it and if so how? -- precede science.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
Old 06-27-2007, 04:47 AM   #5 (permalink)
JoeDuck
 
JoeDuck's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a JoeDuck RSS Feed

Yes. They are inextricably linked and the philosophy of science is itself defined by science under the most reasonable paradigms that define human thought.

The scientific method allows us to discard many silly notions of the philosophical underpinnings of the world, but as scientists we must remain skeptical of all our thoughts and paradigms.

It is in this skeptical role that philosophy plays a critical role in the big show - allowing us to question the very things that seem so clear to us after the application of the scientific method.

Hmmm - I'm pretty skeptical of THIS answer.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
Old 06-27-2007, 04:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
yodasminion
 
yodasminion's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a yodasminion RSS Feed

Absolutely! There are many places where philosophy can intersect with science, and in some places philosophy has helped science along.

Take mathematics, for instance. Before the 20th Century, mathematicians were basing arithmetic, the foundation of all mathematics, on certain "self-evident" axioms, like 1+1=2. If you assumed certain things, they argued, math can be built from the ground up.

Several philosophers, like Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, came along and asked the very relevant question "Well, if it's so self-evident, why should we have to assume it? Why can't it be proved?" In response, Russell (a philosopher) and Alfred North Whitehead (a mathematician) wrote Principia Mathematica in 1910. In it, they proved that arithmetic can be built from the ground up using logic. Math basically has a sound foundation in logic; it is derived from logic, in a sense.

There are many other cases where science and philosophy have intersected. In general though, they are two completely different subjects that ask different questions. Science asks "Why does gravity work the way it does? How does a star work? Where is the edge of the universe?" Philosophy asks "What is the nature of right and wrong? How do we know if something is sentient? Where is God, if there is one?"

These are, for the most part separate questions, which sometimes intersect.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Newsvine this Post!Netscape this Post!
 


Shoutbox
 
Loading...


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where can I get ideas for our science project? Denise The Archives 1 08-25-2007 01:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Inspired Opulence RSS Feeds - Contact Us - Inspired Opulence - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

A vBSkinworks Design
Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Inspired Opulence. All Rights Reserved.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Forum